Pp. But the Court did not Next lesson. McDonald v Chicago The Court held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the 2nd Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause … McDonald v. City of Chicago in 2010 was a landmark case for gun rights in the City of Chicago. McDonald v. Chicago (2010) Summary The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the 2008 case of D.C. v. Heller that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to keep weapons at home for self-defense. Case Summary of McDonald v. Chicago: Chicago residents, concerned about their own safety, challenged the City of Chicago’s handgun ban. Possession of an unregistered firearm was a crime 2) the Second Amendment includes an individual right to keep and bear arms, Otis McDonald and other Chicago residents sued the city for violating the Constitution. Building on the Court’s recent decision in Heller, the petitioners sought to have the Second Amendment apply to the States, either under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, or by incorporation through the Due Process Clause. Chicago's law required anyone who wanted to own a handgun to register it. A public school district bans students from wearing t-shirts supporting presidential candidates before an election Selective incorporation: lesson overview. Practice: Selective incorporation. McDonald v Chicago Based on previous rulings, which of the following scenarios would most likely be ruled that the government violated the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment? McDonald v. Chicago . (a) Petitioners base their case on two submissions. 5–9, 11–19, 19–33. McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees ‘the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,’ applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government. 2 MCDONALD v. CHICAGO Syllabus teenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment right, rec-ognized in Heller, to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self- defense. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia handgun ban violated the Second Amendment. This is the currently selected item. Since the case involved the District of Columbia’s handgun ban, the right found in the Second Amendment applied only to the national […] The 2008 Supreme Court case Heller v.District of Columbia ruled that Washington D.C. gun control laws that effectively banned the possession of handguns violated an individual’s Second Amendment right to self-defense.